JamesB88
Established Member
I was recently talking to a Cham expert on uvb bulbs and much more, but she was saying the screen actually blocks about 50% of the uvb's light from penetrating into the screen cage as most cham owners have, so she said she uses a 10.0 uvb instead of a 5.0. Has anyone else heard of this or know of any testing that has actually been done to back this? My Cham seems great under his 5.0 but if a 10.0 is the healthier way to go then that's what I want to do! Just wanted a little more feedback on this topic.
Thanks guys!
Thanks guys!