K kinyonga Chameleon Queen Mar 1, 2020 #1 Were they her own eggs she dug up, moved and replaced on top...on purpose? https://www.biotaxa.org/hn/article/download/48692/51195
Were they her own eggs she dug up, moved and replaced on top...on purpose? https://www.biotaxa.org/hn/article/download/48692/51195
Redman Avid Member Mar 1, 2020 #2 Seems unlikely to me. The moved eggs were probably harmed by the process if they were in an early stage of development, even if re-covered. My guess is more along the lines of an instinctual response to the eggs and her not seeing them as other than her own. But that is, of course, only supposition.
Seems unlikely to me. The moved eggs were probably harmed by the process if they were in an early stage of development, even if re-covered. My guess is more along the lines of an instinctual response to the eggs and her not seeing them as other than her own. But that is, of course, only supposition.
K kinyonga Chameleon Queen Mar 1, 2020 #3 It didn't make sense to me that it was more than an accident/coincidence either because of turning the eggs.
It didn't make sense to me that it was more than an accident/coincidence either because of turning the eggs.
PetNcs Chameleon Enthusiast Mar 3, 2020 #4 I had a discussion with the author itnis anabsolute soecullation and coincidence, the conclusions are weak and fake
I had a discussion with the author itnis anabsolute soecullation and coincidence, the conclusions are weak and fake