Klyde O'Scope
Chameleon Enthusiast
Can you give me a little more than that? You made the observation (paraphrasing) that mixed-breeds are healthier in general than "pure-bred"s, and I agree that that can be true, but isn't always. (I come to this after many beer-soaked evening discussions with veterinarians, who explained to me why mixed breeds can be unhealthy too. It's a Con-Sub even among vets) As with any pairings, it ultimately comes down to the genetic material of both parents, dominant vs. recessive genes, and a roll of the dice—and I don't even understand most of this stuff!The dog breeder you mentioned would breed purebreds through 3 lines for intelligence, retrieving, etc
My point was that while dog breeding used to emphasize confirmation above all, in recent years and understanding of genetics, many breeders (the good ones) are realizing the errors & folly of the past, and working to improve their breeds (i.e the breed in general), and strive for health over confirmation and other traits.
Perhaps I got muddled in the heat of my post...
What kind of beneficial traits are you thinking about in chameleons? I think most would say that animals with genetic diseases (or predispositions) shouldn't be bred, and that goes for dogs and other domestic animals as well. I think the dog breeders' aim is to breed these diseases & propensities out so that they're no longer a concern (except for random mutation, which AFAIK cannot be predicted).