Can you ID these animals?

[ssapssaebi]

I'm not so sure that I can post this thread or not.
But, please look at this on kingsnake.com

http://market.kingsnake.com/detail.php?cat=52&de=761293

This as posted from undergrondreptile and just say pygmy chams, not common name or scientific name.

To me first and third one looks spectral pygmy, but I'm not so sure about second. just bearded?

 

[Brad Ramsey]

They are R. spectrum.
The 1st and 3rd pictures represent a male specimen and the middle (second) picture is of a female.

-Brad

 

[Ellron]

That is crazy Brad! How do you identify them!? Do you have an extensive data base of all chameleon species in your head, and how to sex them?!

 

[ssapssaebi]

They are R. spectrum.
The 1st and 3rd pictures represent a male specimen and the middle (second) picture is of a female.

-Brad

Thanks a lot Brad!
you are the master of ID!!

 

[Brad Ramsey]

Thanks a lot Brad!
you are the master of ID!!

I absolutely am not!
I have made more ID mistakes on these forums than I care to admit to
However, with this species the hemipenal bulge is HUGE!
Half the tail of a male is big swollen "manhood"!
Hard to miss.

-Brad

 

[ssapssaebi]

I absolutely am not!
I have made more ID mistakes on these forums than I care to admit to
However, with this species the hemipenal bulge is HUGE!
Half the tail of a male is big swollen "manhood"!
Hard to miss.

-Brad

Yes, that's right!
Unfortunately, my male just died few days ago with that huge bulge.

Then, can you help me to ID this link as well?

http://market.kingsnake.com/detail.php?cat=52&de=762064

They are claiming Brookesia stumpffi, but I think it's not.

Thank you so much!

 

[Chris Anderson]

Then, can you help me to ID this link as well?

http://market.kingsnake.com/detail.php?cat=52&de=762064

They are claiming Brookesia stumpffi, but I think it's not.

Thank you so much!

Those are Rieppeleon brevicaudatus, most definitely not Brookesia stumpffi.

Chris

 

[Brad Ramsey]

You're right they are not.

The species shown in those pictures is R. brevicaudatus.
From top to bottom: male, female, female.

-Brad

 

[Brad Ramsey]

Chris,
We were typing together again!

-Brad

 

[Brad Ramsey]

I saw the "Brookesia stumpffi" ad earlier .... if they had actually been this species, I would have purchased every animal they had at $25 each!

-Brad

 

[ssapssaebi]

Those are Rieppeleon brevicaudatus, most definitely not Brookesia stumpffi.

Chris

Thanks a lot!
That's what I think.
I don't know why they posted with wrong names.

 

[ssapssaebi]

You're right they are not.

The species shown in those pictures is R. brevicaudatus.
From top to bottom: male, female, female.

-Brad

You are absolutely right! I can tell that they are male, female and female.
Thanks again!

 

[ssapssaebi]

I saw the "Brookesia stumpffi" ad earlier .... if they had actually been this species, I would have purchased every animal they had at $25 each!

-Brad

That's why I'm curious. I think $25 is a bit less for Brookesia stumpffi.

 

[Cavin]

http://www.lostlakechameleons.com/pygmy.html

if you want to but them cheaper lol