Yes, and yes.
Ferguson used them in his lab as an important part of his panther chameleon diet over multiple generations. The chameleons were fed only 2 insects- crickets and mealworms. Both species were fed a specialized diet, but if I remember correctly, it was the exact same diet. Mealworms were selected not only for the nutritional variety, but also because they gutloaded calcium from the diet better than crickets. (had a higher calcium content after eating the same stuff the crickets were eating, than the crickets did)
I thought I just posted a link not long ago about their nutritional analysis with some links- now I can't find the post, but you can use a search engine to find nutritional analysis- basically the links pointed to mealworms being similar to crickets in some respects and similar to superworms in others.
One thing I hate about nutritional analysis of insects though- they always come across like the analysis is written in stone. We know this is not true- feed your feeders different things and the analysis will be different- just like ferguson found in his lab with gutloaded prey. We also know that if the insects are fed a high quality diet long term and grown on it, they are much more nutritious as well. The foodstuff becomes the stuff that they build their body out of. Gutloading short term or late term after growth does not do this and does not have the same effect. Sorry- no references handy, just stuff I read years ago.