javadi
Chameleon Enthusiast
Just a thought I had so wanted to bring it up in case others had any ideas.
As we've learned more recently, the veiled chameleon seems to live in a more temperate, cooler environment than we once thought, folks like @PetNcs have made that pretty clear (at least in its homeland of Yemen, not Florida etc.). Temps at night in the Yemen wadis seem to get pretty chilly, and even during the day (depending on the season), the temps don't get super high. However, egg incubation practices for the species don't seem to reflect that. It seems the standard is incubation in the high 70s with good success. I wonder if keeping the eggs cooler or doing some form of diapause in this species would impact offspring outcome. A few studies in this species show differences in offspring "success" and development due to different incubation parameters.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18512704/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15286942/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17890118/
Since the current approach works and produces healthy babies, there seems to not be much rationale to change it. But maybe things could be even better in ways we don't know about if we switch things up. Just some thoughts.
The point here is, why is incubation of this species seemingly incongruent with the conditions they experience in the wild?
As we've learned more recently, the veiled chameleon seems to live in a more temperate, cooler environment than we once thought, folks like @PetNcs have made that pretty clear (at least in its homeland of Yemen, not Florida etc.). Temps at night in the Yemen wadis seem to get pretty chilly, and even during the day (depending on the season), the temps don't get super high. However, egg incubation practices for the species don't seem to reflect that. It seems the standard is incubation in the high 70s with good success. I wonder if keeping the eggs cooler or doing some form of diapause in this species would impact offspring outcome. A few studies in this species show differences in offspring "success" and development due to different incubation parameters.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18512704/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15286942/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17890118/
Since the current approach works and produces healthy babies, there seems to not be much rationale to change it. But maybe things could be even better in ways we don't know about if we switch things up. Just some thoughts.
The point here is, why is incubation of this species seemingly incongruent with the conditions they experience in the wild?