cyberlocc
Chameleon Enthusiast
By common knowledge, I mean common knowledge among experienced keepers and my colleagues (I'm a research herpetologist).
Well thats fine and good, but you would understand this is the internet, everyone is a Scientist, or an Engineer when it suits their argument. I do not know you, nor know that to be a fact. Not saying that it isnt, just that its all to common in this hobby and others for that to be embellished.
If you have some Peer Reviewed articles on the subject, by yourself or anyone I would love to read them however . With some blind studys and the likes would be even better .
It's also worth mentioning the gradient of humidity within a relatively small area (higher ambient humidity lower to the ground and within trees/shrubs) so wild F. pardalis have some level of control over the humidity they're exposed to.
That is very true, however my statement involving humidity was Open Air readings in the City of Ambilobe (thats all we have readily available on a day to day, if you have something concrete from F. paradlis, I would love to see that as well). So if its 87% humidity during mid day, in open air in the city around Zero Trees, then as you said the gradient would only be increasing, not decreasing surely.
Again I am not trying to say you nor Bill is incorrect, nor am I saying that I will accept that as fact, either way without seeing more on the subject. I wasn't until today aware that their is a divide on this. Now I am Curious .
I'm not seeing the contradiction that you are, but I'm also skimming right now between errands. None of those in that screen cap are contradictions, to my eyes!
I agree with being skeptical. Re: not increasing humidity, I've personally (and I could, of course, be wrong) taken it to mean "dont spray them more than you usually would/break from routine". High humidity wouldn't necessarily cause many issues with the shedding process (thus the continued recommendation of high overnight humidity), but directly spraying the animal with water could cause the layers of the shed to essentially "collapse" back down on itself, and have to evaporate again to loosen. Thus the designation of a "dry shedder" - they don't need water contact to loosen shed.
My thoughts, anyway! Could be way off the mark.
My apologies, it was not in that particular screen cap. Its alot of Info to Cap lol.
https://www.madcham.de/en/haeutungsprobleme/
And to emphasize one more time, as I got attacked for this recently lol. I am not trying to bash Bill, or put aside his knowledge or his experience, or Anyone's for that matter. Simply stating that 2 sources that I feel are knowledgeable, and experienced are stating vastly different things.
I do not feel that Bill would post info he was not confident in, and fully trust him to not do so. However I also have Faith in the Peer reviewed Data, produced by Madcham, especially as it is Peer reviewed and carried out by a Team made up of Biologists, Vets, and a Touring company with a passion in Chameleons, and the Fact they live on site in Madagascar helps their case. Visiting their, is something I would love to do, and a few of our leading experts have done, and that is great, but these Folks live there.
Obviously someones data is being misunderstood or is incorrect or outdated, for some reason or another. Whose I do not know. However I would very much like to.
Last edited: