pigglett79
Avid Member
From what I understand the 6.5 measures multiple wavelengths and also measures the short wave UVB, therefore it is better for metal halide bulbs as you can determine whether there is a dangerous UV index when comparing to their natural environment.
I also read this on an article "Interestingly, the 6.5 Solarmeter's response actually follows the officially accepted action spectrum for vitamin D3 synthesis (the 7DHC to pre-D3 conversion) more closely than it follows the erythema action spectrum. In other words, it should give a more accurate estimate of D3 production than it does of the UV Index."
I have also read that all the new research is pointing to the UVI being the more critical information for both D3 production and safe bulbs.
The following website details a little and does mention UVB http://www.arcadia-reptile.com/how-uv-meter/
I'm not sure what to think at this point, and just hope the money I invested in this meter was worth it, so far I don't know what to think. All I know is I'm getting really high readings with the new bulbs.
I also read this on an article "Interestingly, the 6.5 Solarmeter's response actually follows the officially accepted action spectrum for vitamin D3 synthesis (the 7DHC to pre-D3 conversion) more closely than it follows the erythema action spectrum. In other words, it should give a more accurate estimate of D3 production than it does of the UV Index."
I have also read that all the new research is pointing to the UVI being the more critical information for both D3 production and safe bulbs.
The following website details a little and does mention UVB http://www.arcadia-reptile.com/how-uv-meter/
I'm not sure what to think at this point, and just hope the money I invested in this meter was worth it, so far I don't know what to think. All I know is I'm getting really high readings with the new bulbs.