DGray
Avid Member
false aralia safe - true or false
The "false aralia" should not be considered safe for grazing species like a veiled. In most books this plant will appear as "Dizygotheca elegantissima", but it is now considered to be a _Schefflera_. It is not on any "safe" plant list I know of; I may not be aware of all the lists that have been made.
While I do not have any specific data on poisonings with this species, it is a member of the _Araliaceae_, and, further, one from New Caledonia, where almost all woody plants seem to be toxic.
Far safer plant would be the Dwarf Scheff: S. arboricola - they are also a lot sturdier.
I would also agree with the others that the dirt should be behind a barrier of some sort, and the substrate should go.
The "false aralia" should not be considered safe for grazing species like a veiled. In most books this plant will appear as "Dizygotheca elegantissima", but it is now considered to be a _Schefflera_. It is not on any "safe" plant list I know of; I may not be aware of all the lists that have been made.
While I do not have any specific data on poisonings with this species, it is a member of the _Araliaceae_, and, further, one from New Caledonia, where almost all woody plants seem to be toxic.
Far safer plant would be the Dwarf Scheff: S. arboricola - they are also a lot sturdier.
I would also agree with the others that the dirt should be behind a barrier of some sort, and the substrate should go.