Gryllidae Per Kcal
Established Member
Proof that ash content effects gut loading? I have read many gut loading studies and ash content may be mentioned if there’s a full nutrient analysis of the different types of feeders but once they start talking about gut loading and the challenges of altering nutrients in crickets and mealworms, ash content is never considered a factor. The factors that effect gut loading capacity is palatability, temperature, age, and dish placement for non burrowing feeders. Their calcium to phosphorus ratio is undesirable like other feeders (except for BSFL) unless a proven gut loading diet is used. This is not high calcium vegetables, it’s diets like Repashy Superload, Mazuri Better Bug ( tends to cause a blockage in mealworms, and consequently didn’t increase calcium very well), Mazuri Hi-Calcium Cricket Diet ( more effective in increasing calcium in mealworms), and Züküdla Cricket Max2.Look up the ash content in mealworms, it’s low, which means they can’t hold gutload as well as they need to. There’s your proof. They also aren’t easy to digest and can cause impaction in chameleons from their high chitin levels. They have a bad calcium-to-phosphorus ratio and are fatty, too. They don’t make top feeder lists for bearded dragons, leopard geckos, chameleons and more. Go through at least the first two pages of this Google search if you want:
mealworm nutritional value vs other feeder insects