Futurechameleommom
Member
I didn't say you cant put a baby in a big cage.
You can, it will likely be fine.
Just saying, that not everyone feels that way, there are of course arguments to both sides, however the wild argument that gets thrown around for this and other debates, is not a reasonable one. The Wild is not some fairy tale land, with feeders abound and perfect basking spots available for everyone. The wild is cruel, hard, and unforgiving place that few survive, not something we are trying to emulate in captivity.
There is also as James said, and I would endorse as well. The argument for separate caging being Parasites. You buy a nice fancy cage, deck it out, with cork bark on the walls, 100s of dollars of plants, CUC Crew that you have been breeding for months, throw that baby in for the vet to tell you 3 days later, your baby has coccida, and all of that work, money and time is now worthless in the dumpster. Everything needs thrown away, the cage needs deep cleaned, and preferably you need another thats easy to clean and has less stuff to monitor health and clean up easier.
This doesn't even end with just parasites, it could be any other magnitude of disease or illness, that is spreadable.
From that aspect alone, which is something I would suggest anyway, all babies should not be added to large cages, not because of the size, but because until the animal is known to be clear and healthy its easier to ensure those things in the tub he was suggested.
Size could too be a factor, I know like you said the wild, however the other flip to that coin is how were the babies raised? Were they raised in DS nurserys? Tiny little cages, with a feeder dish they always knew they could find food in. Now you toss them into a 2x2x4ft cage with a few running crickets, they are not use to eating that way, they are not used to having to track their food. Will they get use to it, ya, but that will take time, and a baby of unknown size may not have that time, especially if they are younger than the 3 months they should be. They have grown accustomed to their tiny cage and feeder bowl, thats all they know. You are uprooting them, and such, they are stressed, and now they dont even know where there food is.
At the end of the day, the breeder obviously has some clue what they are doing, if they were able to breed the animals and keep them alive to this point. They are also the sole insurance of your health guarantee, and that should also be kept in mind. The community has our own individual opinions of what we should and shouldn't do, but especially in that first X days of health guarantee, the community will not be the one replacing the animal if it passes or has issues. So I would do what they said, at least during that Health Guarantee personally.
If I was the breeder and I tell you buy this Linear bulb, and you have no UV light, and I said buy a 40w basking, and you have 100w, and I said use a 16 inch tub, and your using a 10 gal aquarium, and you PM me 3 days after arrival and say the animal passed. Do you think I am going to replace that animal? When you did not do anything as I said to? Especially when all the things you did could kill the animal?
I mean ya, there is a plethora of reasons. Its not just about food, however that most certainly is likely an aspect. Of the videos I have seen of wild chams hatching and be being videoed, they do not go far. They hatch under the bush they were laid, and tend to stay there for awhile, on that bush together, sometimes with adults present sometimes not. At least for the first few weeks, from the few videos and such I have seen on the subject. Fighting, Predators, lack of Water due to bad timing, ect, are all also likely issues that lead to their demise.
I'm not an expert on this whatsoever, but what I have gathered from reading and researching is getting a Cham is always a risk. Whether you put them in a small or large cage there are risks. At the end of the day, we are trying to replicate their natural habitat the best we can and throwing them in a small cage is taking away from that. I think when people put them in a larger cage it's because it's we
I didn't say you cant put a baby in a big cage.
You can, it will likely be fine.
Just saying, that not everyone feels that way, there are of course arguments to both sides, however the wild argument that gets thrown around for this and other debates, is not a reasonable one. The Wild is not some fairy tale land, with feeders abound and perfect basking spots available for everyone. The wild is cruel, hard, and unforgiving place that few survive, not something we are trying to emulate in captivity.
There is also as James said, and I would endorse as well. The argument for separate caging being Parasites. You buy a nice fancy cage, deck it out, with cork bark on the walls, 100s of dollars of plants, CUC Crew that you have been breeding for months, throw that baby in for the vet to tell you 3 days later, your baby has coccida, and all of that work, money and time is now worthless in the dumpster. Everything needs thrown away, the cage needs deep cleaned, and preferably you need another thats easy to clean and has less stuff to monitor health and clean up easier.
This doesn't even end with just parasites, it could be any other magnitude of disease or illness, that is spreadable.
From that aspect alone, which is something I would suggest anyway, all babies should not be added to large cages, not because of the size, but because until the animal is known to be clear and healthy its easier to ensure those things in the tub he was suggested.
Size could too be a factor, I know like you said the wild, however the other flip to that coin is how were the babies raised? Were they raised in DS nurserys? Tiny little cages, with a feeder dish they always knew they could find food in. Now you toss them into a 2x2x4ft cage with a few running crickets, they are not use to eating that way, they are not used to having to track their food. Will they get use to it, ya, but that will take time, and a baby of unknown size may not have that time, especially if they are younger than the 3 months they should be. They have grown accustomed to their tiny cage and feeder bowl, thats all they know. You are uprooting them, and such, they are stressed, and now they dont even know where there food is.
At the end of the day, the breeder obviously has some clue what they are doing, if they were able to breed the animals and keep them alive to this point. They are also the sole insurance of your health guarantee, and that should also be kept in mind. The community has our own individual opinions of what we should and shouldn't do, but especially in that first X days of health guarantee, the community will not be the one replacing the animal if it passes or has issues. So I would do what they said, at least during that Health Guarantee personally.
If I was the breeder and I tell you buy this Linear bulb, and you have no UV light, and I said buy a 40w basking, and you have 100w, and I said use a 16 inch tub, and your using a 10 gal aquarium, and you PM me 3 days after arrival and say the animal passed. Do you think I am going to replace that animal? When you did not do anything as I said to? Especially when all the things you did could kill the animal?
I mean ya, there is a plethora of reasons. Its not just about food, however that most certainly is likely an aspect. Of the videos I have seen of wild chams hatching and be being videoed, they do not go far. They hatch under the bush they were laid, and tend to stay there for awhile, on that bush together, sometimes with adults present sometimes not. At least for the first few weeks, from the few videos and such I have seen on the subject. Fighting, Predators, lack of Water due to bad timing, ect, are all also likely issues that lead to their demise.
That is a very good point I didn't think of. If the breeder told you to put them in a small enclosure, and you put them in a big one, if something happens they may not give you the health guarantee. That would suck, especially if you got an expensive Cham.