MissSkittles
Chameleon Enthusiast
Well, we need to provide our veileds with plants and artificial ones are too risky as they have been known to eat them. In the wild they eat whatever plants are native, however they only live less than a year. If there is a plant that is better than pothos and others listed as safe for veileds, we don’t know about it. As for renal failure, I have been wondering about types of water that people use. When we review husbandry, we never ask about the water. The keeper that hasn’t a clue about correct uvb, supplements and the like is most likely to be using plain tap water which who knows what that contains.With all that been said still concerns me somewhat guess it's one of them it wont kill your cham but unknown if it harms or its long term effects. It's use in chameleon enclosures is more to do with its hardiness to survive without having to provide additional lighting & vining properties with a bonus air purifier (which worries me further as what does it pull out of the air and how is that processed within the plant).
OP says it has killed the plant as in eaten most of it, the thread of toxicology just shared leads to a prognosis that too much consumption of the oxylates bound with calcium can lead to renal failure- which can be known as an issue with chameleons in captivity (ould there be a link) i guess it a risk upto the individual keeper to make, like not having a thermostat to stop your cham burning itself.are we sure its not doing harm allowing it eat it guess that's why it is still an ongoing debate . Think I'll stay on the side of for non plant eating species only. But ive never kept a veiled and i certainly haven't done experiments on them to draw my conclusion