phelsumatic
New Member
The evolution of panther chameleon's is way differant than the selective breeding of them by man.FYI
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I'm quite serious.
The general public doesn't know who was the subcontractor that used lead paint, poisoned the gluten,
deleted the flame retardant etc.
All they know is that it was made in China. Substitutes were used to lower production costs, cheat.. whatever
The work wasn't generating enough profit to maintain the standards of quality or profit. Resulting in " a few incidents".
Now the whole export production market is affected in china and tarnished.. everyone loses.
How does this apply?
If the price of these animals gets shaved too low
The expenditures establishing a name/brand , in new blood, new lines and top quality care of the hatchlings
gets eliminated. Many will be unable to stand behind their sales. Without the above many people will get stuck
with poor and unhealthy animals, leaving them feeling sour and destroying the general marketplace
(china's exports = panther chameleon market). everyone loses.
It's already bad enough with the common myth that these animals are "so sensitive they die within 3 months"
from the time when they were wild caught imports.
It's in everyones best interests to maintain top quality to combat that perception -so everyone wins.
Hence the required investment and payback.
Quote:
all those indonesian panthers start to flood ~snip~then what will you do
Well, against a foreign product there are several established methods to combat and protect a domestic market.
IF it's worth protecting.... and I hope that in the future it will be worth protecting -everyone will benefit as a result.
Quote:
myself will never pay 400.00 for a panther cham none of them no matter what morph.local etc. But that is just me.
Where did you get the $400.00 price from? I'm seeing $200 -$300 as the norm for quality young.
Well even then, you don't pay for quality... that's fine... deal with sick or sub quality animals.
I know that when I walk in and show your friends a top quality animal.. yours will lose it's shine really quickly.
The differences between wild caught and undeveloped lines VS developed is growing greater year by year.
From my experience you generally get less than what you pay for -if you go cheap.
Cheap undercutters are using the publics perception of quality animals -to move theirs.
Something always has to give, history has show if it's not the wild stocks -it's going to be the animals (both are unethical imo).
Quote:
I simply felt the need to bring the attention where it was due at the price of some of these animals
and this is what irks me...
There's always someone that wants to try to rain on someone else's parade or even troll.
I'm not even selling my clutches publicly and here I am defending the current free market
against someone that thinks the animals are too expensive. Well, that's fine
(there's always going to be someone) IF anything, it shows that they're properly priced.
You are free to breed them yourself and try to undercut everyone else if you like.
But if you're honest about it, you'll find yourself with thousands of overhead and at
least 2 years of work to pay for even before you have your first clutch to sell
(barring any losses or mishaps .. and trust me, those will happen!).
Hiroprotagonist
Quote:
Does it cost 5+ times as much to raise panthers as it does to raise veilds?
Well for starters. it's not raising that it's the cost.. it's the investment.
The domestic population for the veils is different than for the panthers.
Even if you discount the hybrids that got mixed in and misidentified species...
we have muddled all the different locals that *could have* been developed
in the same manner as the panthers are currently.
Result: the market has been "destroyed" for those animals by not having
people protect them and develop them properly from the start.
Sure they're now cheap -but they're also looking the part.
I've seen markets destroyed by the casual non professional bozo looking
to make a quick buck -nobody wins.
Where as, Veild chameleons could have been **stunning** with several different forms/locals
if there had been enough incentive to invest in working with them earlier on.
Right now even our boards here are filled with people that have unremarkable adults
breeding whose offspring are going to be sold or "dumped" somewhere for "?".
How many of those new breeders have invested in researching, locating and
developing the best lines available?
Or did they just get a pair at the local petco as pets and haphazardly bred them for fun?
A good proven male/female panther is something to be cared for and protected.
You're better off not forcing her to breed and produce often. But only 2 times year
with a good male to make top quality offspring that will go to good homes.
Price them high enough to cover expenses and keep the system moving forward
Reserving many offspring with potential (increasing overhead) to pick the best of the best to develop.
it's all about reinvestment not just making enough to pay your bills only.
In short, the money goes to developing the breeding lines to make better quality animals in the future
and being able to do it all ethically.
Prices will fall...
When a plateau has been reached with the animals development and the lines standardized.
but right now every year we see some serious development from each of the main breeder's projects.
That costs money to perform.
That costs money and for those that want to have a unique and exotic pet that their friends
and ooh and aaahhh at... then they'll have to help support that development.
Now if someone wants to take some of the results of these efforts and ride the coattails by
breeding someone else's hatchlings -then go ahead.
But please don't complain about other people pricing if you're not also working to
create new and more appealing animals yourself.
I disagree with your view on evolution and selective breeding. When we remove a species from the wild we are altering their evolution, even if we leave others. Look at dogs for instance, at one point they were naturally found in the wild? How common are they now? Also think about how many different species their are now. When we take a chameleon from wild we alter it's world. Yes we try our best to replicate the wild, but we fall short. Inevitably we are altering the species even if we let them breed on their own in captivity. So if you don't support selective breeding I feel it is hypocrisy to support animal captivity, the consequences are analogous.When we selective breed our cham's for color alone we are doing them as a species an injustice.Selectively breeding a panther simply for an all blue panther to me is wrong.This is just my opinion.
We are not altering there evolution as long as some still exist in the wild, we are altering there appearance simply for money's sake by selective breeding for color etc.
Also natural selection occur's over thousand's of years depending on the species and selective breeding by man depending on species takes a fraction of that.
Sorry kent, please know that this isn't against you.
and I know it sounds like a broken record..
but I believe it's really is kinda important.