summoner12
Avid Member
It is interesting. I just don't like that it is giving people wild ideas on what to 'cross'..... does anyone notice how apes and chimps don't go hooking up?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll let all the experts here have their debates & pass along a friendly and well deserved congratulations - I hope all the babies are healthy and happy - regardless of what your plans are with them.
I do have a question for the more scientific minded folks here though, and that is- If this is truly the first of it's kind, would that not give the "creator" the rights to naming this new breed/species or whatever genetic moniker is appropriate here???
Congrats again & keep posting pics of the babies!!
Hybridizing itself can be extremely risky. When hybridizing you risk the female being injured or dying, either by the male itself, being unable to lay the clutch, or from the stress and drain of producing a potentially useless clutch of eggs. In addition to potentially killing one or both of the adults, it runs the risk of producing a clutch of weak babies that suffer before they die. Finally, it runs the risk of producing a clutch of hybrids that survive and encourages others to act irresponsibly and do it themselves. People should be working to breed pure species, not screwing with trying to produce crap.
Obviously in this case, it was an accident. I adamantly feel, however, that anyone who intentionally attempts to hybridize chameleon species is being extremely irresponsible.
Chris
It is interesting. I just don't like that it is giving people wild ideas on what to 'cross'..... does anyone notice how apes and chimps don't go hooking up?
It is interesting. I just don't like that it is giving people wild ideas on what to 'cross'..... does anyone notice how apes and chimps don't go hooking up?
I'll let all the experts here have their debates & pass along a friendly and well deserved congratulations - I hope all the babies are healthy and happy - regardless of what your plans are with them.
I do have a question for the more scientific minded folks here though, and that is- If this is truly the first of it's kind, would that not give the "creator" the rights to naming this new breed/species or whatever genetic moniker is appropriate here???
Congrats again & keep posting pics of the babies!!
Chimps are apes . Also you and I are apes.....and we have some Neanderthal DNA too........cross breeding between species occurs in nature........even between human species.......
I still think it's irresponsible to do it deliberately, of course
Humans are not considered one of the Great Apes. If I recall correctly people are considered hominids. The great apes are Chimps (plus banobo's spelling?), Gorillas and Orangutans.
This thread is making me want to watch the entire X Men series of movies.
It's Bonobos, and the word 'Ape' is quite a loose term for taxonomic purposes
Hominoidea contains two families of living (extant) species:
Hylobatidae consists of four genera and sixteen species of gibbon, including the lar gibbon and the siamang. They are commonly referred to as lesser apes.
Hominidae consists of orangutans, gorillas, common chimpanzees, bonobos and humans.[1][2] Alternatively, the hominidae family are collectively described as the great apes.[3][4][5][6]
Members of the superfamily are called hominoids (not to be confused with "hominids" or "hominins").
Some or all hominoids are also called "apes". However, the term "ape" is used in several different senses. It has been used as a synonym for "monkey" or for any tailless primate with a humanlike appearance.[7] Thus the Barbary macaque, a kind of monkey, is popularly called the "Barbary ape" to indicate its lack of a tail. Biologists have used the term "ape" to mean a member of the superfamily Hominoidea other than humans,[3] or more recently to mean all members of the superfamily Hominoidea, so that "ape" becomes another word for "hominoid".[6][8]
I have always been taught a told that the Great Apes and Hominids are related however are separate and not considered the the same group of species with the point that they should be designated as different groups. Nice quick google!
I corrected the spelling error Bonobos.
Kevin
Chimps are a type of great ape. I concur though I do not endorse selectively breeding hybrids. We should have stable cb populations of non hybrids first (which we are still far from accomplishing) before designer or just hybrids in general should even be considered.
Jeremy
Chimps are apes . Also you and I are apes.....and we have some Neanderthal DNA too........cross breeding between species occurs in nature........even between human species.......
I still think it's irresponsible to do it deliberately, of course
Yeah i messed up... sorry lol
between human species? you mean apes mating with humans or human species mating with other human species?
He's talking about Neanderthal DNA in the genome of modern Europeans (evidence of cross breeding between two human species in the past).
He's talking about Neanderthal DNA in the genome of modern Europeans (evidence of cross breeding between two human species in the past).
By the way, I just thought I'd mention that as soon as we've taken these animals out of the wild and put them in cages, nothing from there on is "natural." Even if it's breeding gracilis to gracilis or calyp to calyp, it is still human selection. Since there is no possibility that either of those species or their captive-produced hybrids are ever going to be released back into the wild I don't see any problem with them in captivity. I also don't see this becoming an epidemic of hybrids either. How long have calyptratus been bred in the US? Seventeen? Eighteen years? And these are the first hybrids (other than crossed locales ) produced in the US from them?
The look awesome.....feed those little ones good.....
If u get a chance, take a pic of the one when it turns blue....