Don't ever tell me I don't take proper care of my chameleons, I take amazing care of them. I am willing to bet that my custom cages are larger than whatever you keep your chameleons in (not to mention I allow them to free roam), I've invested way more money for the proper lighting and set-ups to (as closely as possible) resemble their natural environments, and have spent much more time researching chameleons than you. I will also bet that they have a far wider variety of insects than you feed yours, and that they are at least as healthy if not healthier than yours, and have lived to be much older than any single one of yours.
Domestic cats today came from territorial, asocial species.
https://books.google.nl/books?id=bqz9-IUUwdcC&pg=PA420&lpg=PA420&dq=cat+evolution+asocial&source=bl&ots=Y9_wZXx7tH&sig=kVwz6KYCVtpoJ_dvzQvZx06jjmE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj75sqM4NfNAhUCGR4KHTF6Dx0Q6AEISDAG#v=onepage&q=cat evolution asocial&f=false
https://books.google.nl/books?id=KcPESM389aUC&pg=PA196&lpg=PA196&dq=cat+evolution+asocial&source=bl&ots=h3RykbEvII&sig=Ab6t9vhTiowZK1NhZia9flNTWW0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj75sqM4NfNAhUCGR4KHTF6Dx0Q6AEIQzAF#v=onepage&q=cat evolution asocial&f=false
Do you research and don't make assumptions when you don't know what you're talking about. My apologies for suggesting that chameleons, which we all cherish as a hobby and are enthusiastic about, might be self-aware. And again I never said a crocodile (edit: does not have***) maternal instincts--they do protect their young but according to your philosophy since it is "against their nature" to befriend a human, there is no bond there and I quote "not compatible" of having a bond.
You seem to have a great deal of trouble understanding my written word. Reread what I have written. Nowhere do I comment on the care you take of your chameleons. You have taken this discussion to a new low with a childish ad hominem argument of who takes better care of their animals or spends more money on them.
You propose a hypothesis supposedly using a well-known experiment but you don't replicate the experiment. You suggest a chameleon possesses social traits (by bonding with a human) that goes against everything that is known by science about the very nature of chameleons. You do not use scientific method to prove your hypothesis, yet throw the term around as if you know what it means. You reference experiments on self awareness (using a mirror) done by scientists--who used the scientific method by the way--but don't follow their methodology. You create the illusion that you are performing the same experiment with a very limited number of test subjects with no controls think it has value.
You title the thread: "My new wild-caught veiled...he shows self-awareness via the mirror test"
Your first post on the thread refers, both in the title and in the post that you did "the mirror test" with several chameleons.
The experiments using the mirror to test self awareness--actually they were designed to test self recognition and were known as Mirror Self-Recognition Test--were performed on a variety of species and were quite similar, The "experiment" you set up and your observations does not in any way "mirror" those experiments, pun intended. (Note: Self awareness is not the same as being conscious of your self within the environment, but is one step further in awareness and recognizing one is aware that they are aware of themselves within the environment. It is about introspection.) You have misappropriated the name of a very valid experiment and twisted it into something else else entirely, all the while calling it this very well known experiment.
The experiments you are alluding to, and I repeat yours bear no resemblance to those experiments, were done in a very controlled fashion as all scientific experiments that have any value are. Basically, a mark of some sort that had no odor was applied to a part of the animals that it could not see unless using a mirror. Chimps were anaesthetized and an odorless mark was applied. When they were shown a mirror, the animals touched and investigated the spot they could not see and did not know was on their body until they saw it in the mirror. Magpies had their throat feathers colored (a bird cannot see below it's beak as the beak blocks its vision) and they started scratching at their throats.
That's "The Mirror Test." You didn't do a "Mirror Test."
And then you throw out the suggestion that chameleons, a species that has no social interactions except to mate and defend territory and have no maternal instincts, might bond with a human. For examples to prove your argument you use two species that have very strong maternal instincts (and have formed relationships with humans--I'll take your word for the crocodile story but who knows if that isn't perhaps a load of crock, too), both species that supposedly live solitary lives. Somehow that proves a chameleon can bond with a human.
You attribute words to me I never said.
You state I don't know what I am talking about.
And then your argument degenerates even further into a childish ad hominem argument about who spends more money on their chameleons or who takes better care of them.
Best of all, you bring up the evolution of domestic cats from
Felis silvestris lybica or the African Wild Cat. This is so funny, I had to leave it to last because the African Wild Cat is something I know a lot about. I own one. I brought him back from Saudi Arabia. There is nothing solitary about that cat. But I digress; you use a quote from a book on the social signaling of African Wild Cats which has absolutely nothing to do with what we have been discussing. Now, if you want to talk about the difference between the language an African Wild Cat uses and the communication skills of a domestic cat, your quote might have some value and we could have an interesting discussion. But, that's not what we are talking about, is it?
Ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, the list of fallacious arguments is endless.
But most important, and the reason I responded to this thread is that I don't want the novice person to think their chameleon will ever love them or enjoy being mauled by them. I and others end up writing a lot of responses in the health section when those very same animals end up in poor health because they have a suppressed immune system from the chronic stress of being handled. That's why I responded. What you wrote is not good for chameleons.