SoCaliSon
Avid Member
um,
I've read and re-read the post
nowhere is that stated by the threads author
that the embryo was "moving" and "struggling".
I know from my own examination of a veiled cham embryo
that they are not active and "breathing" ... the only response I was getting
was color and pattern changes in response to stimuli.
(mine was much further along in it's development).
Okay...
As you can see it's very far along, nails, scales, and eyelids are clearly developed. The eyes moved a bit, but the lids never opened... maybe because he could see through them already? Once separated from theamnion he began to breathe. Big breathes at first then settled into a normal pattern. The heart was clearly beating. Most of his skin was more like a fish than a chameleon's. We used warm water to hydrate him during this whole thing... poor guy.
You must have missed that.
There was also the mention that this was entirely needless
and that all the information was available via proper research.
well I'll ask you to please show us this research
that didn't involve the loss of an egg or it's embryo.
I remember searching for more detailed information and found nothing
regarding embryonic development.
I just did a google and found this in literally less than 5 minutes...
http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...serid=10&md5=3f75bf61d0c79d2d74a4fcf9afb010f1
and this 2 mins later...
http://books.google.com/books?id=8W...vY5JcCM&sig=bKI9onOF6H961PHWBtwGXq4v1Ik&hl=en
I actually learned a lot more there than from those pics to tell you the truth.
I also found another site with pics of 185 day embryo that was opened as well.
The OP said they looked fine and that he hadn't candled them. I think with a little more research they could have known that sometimes it does take unusually long... and that if done right it is safe to candle to egg to look for veins. I can understand if you candle the egg and it appears dead. At that point I am not against opening the egg. But if you discover a living embryo... I don't think it is right to keep alive for any amount of time... Just my opinion.
The human anatomical studies were conducted hundreds of years ago "without licensing" by mavericks.
There was always direct opposition by some moral authority at the time opposing them,
holding things back. The information that was gained by those individuals
allowed advancements in human medicine that has benefitted all, including the moralists (ironically).
This is very true... But they did not have the information available to them that we do... I have thousands of scientists research at my fingertips. You are referring to the roots of scientific study... Science and the publics acceptance of science has evolved. We are allowed to experiment and research these things... which is wonderful. IMO this incident was unnecessary, and executed for the wrong reason. You can learn something from it after the fact, but that does not change the ladder.
Have a good night everyone!